Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

The EU’s New Tariffs on Chinese Electric Vehicles

The European Commission recently announced the imposition of additional duties on imported Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), with rates reaching up to 38.1%. This move, set to take effect in July, aims to counteract what the EU perceives as excessive subsidies granted to Chinese manufacturers. However, this decision may provoke significant retaliatory measures from Beijing.

Background and Context

The EU’s decision follows a pattern seen in recent trade dynamics between the US and China. Less than a month ago, Washington announced plans to quadruple duties on Chinese EVs to 100%. The new tariffs, ranging from 17.4% to 38.1% on top of the standard 10% car duty, reflect a strong stance against what the EU views as unfair trade practices.

This policy shift marks a significant change in the EU’s trade approach, especially given the importance of the automotive industry. The EU has historically used trade defenses against China, but the focus on such a critical sector indicates a more aggressive strategy.

Impact on the Market

The new tariffs translate into billions of euros in extra costs for Chinese carmakers, a burden they will bear during a period of slowing demand and falling prices in their domestic market. European automakers, already facing competitive pressure from more affordable Chinese EVs, might find some relief. Chinese EVs currently hold about 8% of the EU market share, a figure projected to rise to 15% by 2025, largely due to their lower prices compared to EU-made models.

Despite the new tariffs, some experts believe that the impact on Chinese manufacturers will be limited. Industry representatives have indicated that the tariffs, averaging around 20%, were anticipated and won’t significantly affect the majority of Chinese firms.

Potential Retaliation from China

The announcement has not gone unnoticed by Beijing. The Chinese government has already expressed its intent to safeguard its interests, viewing the EU’s measures as protectionist. This tension echoes previous trade disputes, where both sides imposed tit-for-tat tariffs, affecting various industries.

China has also started an anti-dumping investigation into European imports, signaling potential broader retaliatory actions. This development raises concerns among European industries heavily reliant on exports to China, such as the automotive and spirits sectors.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

For Western companies that export vehicles from China to Europe, the EU’s decision presents new challenges. These companies have been deemed cooperative by the EU and may face lower tariff rates, but the overall uncertainty could disrupt their supply chains and market strategies.

The European automotive industry is divided on the issue. While some welcome the protection against cheap imports, others warn that tariffs could harm the industry by increasing costs and limiting market access. There is a consensus that the negative effects of tariffs could outweigh the benefits, especially for industries with significant exports to China.

Future Outlook

The EU’s provisional duties are set to apply from July 4, with the investigation continuing until November. The outcome could lead to definitive duties lasting up to five years. The potential for retroactive tariffs further complicates the situation.

As the international trade landscape evolves, stakeholders must stay informed and agile. Companies may need to adjust their sourcing strategies, explore new markets, or invest in local production to mitigate the impact of these tariffs. Additionally, ongoing diplomatic negotiations and trade discussions will likely shape the future of EU-China economic relations.

In conclusion, the EU’s decision to impose additional tariffs on Chinese EVs represents a significant shift in trade policy, reflecting broader geopolitical tensions and economic strategies. Businesses involved in the automotive sector, as well as those in related industries, should closely monitor developments and prepare for potential changes in the global trade environment.



Thriving Amid Equipment Shortages: The Power of Strategic Partnerships

Equipment shortages in China are becoming increasingly severe due to high export demand and disruptions to long-haul and intra-Asia services. Vessels are avoiding the Red Sea, leading to longer transits to Europe and North America. This results in delays for Asian shippers receiving the containers they need to transport their cargo.

Impacted Ports and Regions

The Chinese ports of Ningbo, Dalian, and Guangzhou are among the worst affected, facing significant shortages. Inland hubs like Wuhan and Chongqing are also experiencing shortages, particularly for 40-foot and 40-foot high cube containers. This issue extends beyond China, affecting ports in Taiwan and Singapore as well. Additionally, carriers are omitting calls to Indian and Middle Eastern ports to reduce transit delays, leaving empty containers uncollected at ports like Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Rising Export Demands and Their Implications

The increase in containerized exports has exacerbated the issue. Asian exports rose by 13.2% in the first quarter, and U.S. imports from Asia climbed 24% year-over-year in the first four months. Carriers prioritize their biggest customers and long-haul routes over intra-Asia routes, imposing surcharges, restricting containers, charging premiums, and adjusting allocations in response to equipment shortages.

Early Peak Season Disruption

The early peak season has further tightened capacity and driven up spot rates on Asia to North Europe and Mediterranean routes. This peak season, typically seen in May and October for seasonal cargo, has been brought forward by four to six weeks. Carriers are managing the capacity crunch by limiting allocations through blank sailings, rollovers, weight limitations, new cancellation policies, and prioritizing lucrative spot rates over fixed-rate bookings in the Trans-Pacific region. 

Topocean Partnership Advantage

Despite these challenges, Future Forwarding’s long-time Asian partner, Topocean, is a beacon of reliability. As one of the top five largest forwarders, Topocean secures space when carriers prioritize their biggest customers. This ensures that we can offer our clients the dedicated, “boutique” customer service typical of small to medium-sized forwarders, while still benefiting from the advantages of a large forwarder.

Strategic Insights and Future Outlook

 

It is crucial to note that the current surge in demand, particularly from sectors like solar panels, EVs, and batteries, is driven by efforts to avoid new tariffs. However, much of this demand is expected to drop off in the coming months, offering some relief to the strained logistics network. 

 

By leveraging our partnership with Topocean, we can navigate these challenging times, providing our clients with reliable service and strategic advantages. Reach out to us today to learn more

 

FDA to Enforce Cosmetics Facility Registration July 1, 2024

As the landscape of cosmetics regulation continues to evolve, it’s essential for importers and distributors to stay abreast of the latest requirements set forth by regulatory bodies. One such significant development is the enforcement of the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act (MoCRA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Effective July 1, the FDA will begin enforcing this act, mandating that clients importing cosmetics products have their facilities registered with the FDA.

 

The cornerstone of compliance with MoCRA lies in facility registration. By July 1, all facilities involved in importing cosmetics products must ensure their registration with the FDA. This registration process is crucial as it facilitates the FDA’s oversight of cosmetic products entering the U.S. market, ensuring they meet safety and labeling requirements.

 

Additionally, by the same deadline, a designated “responsible person” must furnish the FDA with a comprehensive list of all cosmetics products marketed in the United States. This list should include detailed information on the ingredients of each product. The responsible person, as defined by the FDA, encompasses the manufacturer, packer, or distributor whose name appears on the label of the cosmetic product.

 

To aid in compliance, the FDA has provided a detailed list of cosmetic product categories, streamlining the identification and classification process for importers and distributors. This resource serves as a valuable tool for ensuring accurate categorization and reporting of cosmetics products.

 

While the FDA has not introduced new requirements at the point of entry for now, importers and customs brokers should anticipate future changes. While registration numbers and other cosmetics-related data are not currently required during the entry process, it’s prudent to stay vigilant for updates from the FDA. The agency has assured stakeholders that any forthcoming changes will be communicated well in advance, allowing ample time for necessary adjustments to software and systems.

 

It’s imperative for manufacturers and processors to understand their obligations regarding facility registration. Registration must be completed with the FDA, with renewal required every two years. The FDA holds the authority to suspend a facility’s registration under specific circumstances, particularly if there is a reasonable probability of serious adverse health consequences associated with a cosmetic product distributed by the facility.

 

In the event of a registration suspension, the distribution or sale of cosmetic products from the affected facility becomes a prohibited act. This underscores the importance of stringent adherence to regulatory requirements and proactive measures to ensure product safety and compliance.

 

The enforcement of MoCRA by the FDA signifies a pivotal moment in cosmetics regulation. Importers, distributors, manufacturers, and processors must prioritize compliance with registration and reporting obligations to uphold product safety standards and maintain consumer trust. By staying informed, proactive, and engaged with regulatory developments, stakeholders can navigate these changes effectively while contributing to the overall safety and integrity of the cosmetics industry.

 

Want to know more about how this may affect you? Reach out to Future Forwarding today. 

 

Helpful Links:

Cosmetic Product Categories and Codes

Form FDA 5066 – Registration of Cosmetic Product Facility

Form FDA 5067 – Cosmetic Product Listing

New Import/Export Regulations in the UK

Understanding Incoterms (International Commercial Terms) and customs representation is paramount in international commerce, where goods traverse borders and regulations. However, new policy has introduced additional layers of complexity, particularly for UK importers and exporters. 

 

EXW Exports and DDP Imports: A Detailed Overview

 

EXW (Ex Works) and DDP (Delivered Duty Paid) are pivotal Incoterms, each delineating distinct responsibilities and risks for buyers and sellers. Under EXW, the seller’s obligations conclude once the goods are available at their premises, leaving the buyer responsible for export formalities and transport. Conversely, DDP entails the seller’s responsibility for delivering goods to the buyer’s designated destination, including customs clearance and duty payment.

 

Customs Representation in the UK: Direct vs. Indirect

 

Comprehending customs representation in the UK is crucial. There are two types: Direct and Indirect. Direct representation involves a customs broker acting on behalf of a UK-established company, while Indirect representation sees the broker representing a non-UK entity. The distinction is vital, as it influences liability for customs debts.

 

Liability Considerations and Representation Types

 

The shift in representation types post-Brexit carries significant liability implications. In Direct representation, the principal (importer or exporter) bears sole liability for customs debt. Conversely, the agent and principal are jointly and severally liable in indirect representation. Understanding these nuances is essential to mitigate risks effectively.

 

Customs System Changes: The Introduction of CDS

 

One of the most important changes in the UK’s customs landscape is the implementation of the Customs Declaration Service (CDS). This system, operational for exports since mid-March, introduces several novel data elements, facilitating comprehensive declarations. It accommodates complexities such as different entities serving as exporters, importers, buyers, sellers, declarants, and representatives.

 

Educating Stakeholders: Responsibilities and Awareness

 

Amidst evolving trade dynamics, educating stakeholders assumes paramount importance. It’s crucial for businesses to comprehend their responsibilities under various Incoterms. For instance, in EXW exports, the seller’s responsibility ends when goods are made available, while in DDP imports, the seller bears the onus of delivering goods to the buyer’s location, including customs clearance.

 

Navigating international trade necessitates a nuanced understanding of Incoterms, customs representation, and regulatory changes. For UK traders, meticulous consideration of these factors is imperative to mitigate risks, ensure compliance, and facilitate seamless trade operations. By staying informed and fostering stakeholder education, businesses can adapt to the new realities of global commerce and thrive in an ever-evolving landscape.


Want to know more? Reach out to Future Forwarding today

Phase VII Implementation of the Lacey Act: What Importers Need to Know

In the realm of international trade, staying abreast of regulatory changes is paramount. One such regulation, the Lacey Act, has been pivotal in combating illegal logging and promoting sustainable trade practices concerning plants and plant products. 

Understanding Phase VII:

Phase VII of the Lacey Act introduces a pivotal expansion, necessitating declarations for all remaining plant product Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes that are not entirely composite materials. This expansion signifies a broadening scope, encompassing materials like furniture, cork, and select essential oils that previously did not mandate declarations.

What Importers Need to Prepare For:

If you import goods containing plant products and haven’t filed Lacey Act declarations before, Phase VII mandates a shift in your procedures. Come implementation, you’ll likely need to file declarations for affected items. To prepare, familiarize yourself with your supply chain and the necessary information for filing a declaration. This information can be found on the Information to Include on a Lacey Act Declaration web page.

Understanding Composite Materials:

Composite materials represent a key exemption within the Lacey Act. These materials involve plant products or plant-based components that undergo mechanical or chemical breakdown, subsequently being recomposed or used in manufacturing processes. Common examples include paper, paperboard, particleboard, and medium- to high-density fiberboard (MDF and HDF).

How to File a Declaration:

Importers have two primary avenues for electronically filing declarations:

  • Automated Commercial Environment (ACE): ACE serves as the primary platform for filing Lacey Act declarations. Through this automated system, importers can electronically submit required data to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and partner government agencies, including the APHIS Lacey Act Program.
  • Lacey Act Web Governance System (LAWGS): LAWGS provides an alternative for importers who would otherwise file a paper declaration. Importers utilizing ACE for customs information and LAWGS for Lacey Act declarations must indicate this arrangement in ACE.

While electronic filing is encouraged, importers can also opt to file declarations via mail, primarily catering to small-volume importers. Paper forms and instructions are available on the APHIS website.

Consequences of Non-Compliance:

Compliance with the Lacey Act is non-negotiable. Failure to adhere to declaration requirements can result in both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties range from administrative fines to forfeiture of goods, while criminal penalties encompass imprisonment and substantial fines, particularly for offenses involving significant market value.

Accessing Training Resources:

To assist affected industries in navigating Lacey Act compliance, APHIS has provided grants to organizations like the International Wood Products Association. These grants facilitate access to both in-person and online training on Lacey Act topics until September 2024. Importers can capitalize on these resources to enhance their understanding and adherence to regulatory requirements.

Where to Find More Information:

For comprehensive information on the Lacey Act and its implications for plants and plant products, importers can reach out to APHIS Lacey Act program staff here: lacey.act.declaration@usda.gov or visit the Lacey Act website.

As Phase VII of the Lacey Act unfolds, importers must prioritize compliance to ensure seamless operations within the regulatory framework. By staying informed and leveraging available resources, importers can navigate these changes adeptly, fostering sustainable trade practices and environmental stewardship.


If you have questions, or need assistance, don’t hesitate to reach out to your Future Forwarding representative. 

Navigating the Waves: How OSRA 2.0 Impacts Shippers and the Maritime Industry

In a move aimed at bolstering oversight and protecting US ports and shippers from perceived threats, the US House of Representatives recently passed amendments to federal maritime law. The Ocean Shipping Reform Implementation Act (OSRA 2.0), introduced by Representatives Dusty Johnson and John Garamendi, signifies a significant step in addressing concerns related to Chinese influence, market manipulation, and ensuring fair practices within the shipping industry.

OSRA 2.0, an extension of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, introduces several key provisions that will reshape the landscape for shippers and stakeholders in the maritime domain. One of the notable aspects is the expanded definition of “controlled carriers” to include shipping lines associated with non-market economy countries, particularly those under investigation for anti-competitive practices. This move reflects a proactive stance against unfair advantages and seeks to empower regulatory bodies like the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) to combat such practices effectively.

Moreover, the legislation empowers US shippers by allowing them to file complaints against shipping exchanges suspected of market manipulation. By addressing concerns over freight rate indices and data transparency, OSRA 2.0 aims to promote fairness and integrity in pricing mechanisms, thereby fostering a more equitable environment for all participants.

Another significant facet of OSRA 2.0 is the prohibition on the use of certain Chinese-developed software by US terminal operators. This measure underscores growing apprehensions regarding data security and foreign influence, particularly with regards to critical infrastructure such as port operations. By safeguarding against potential vulnerabilities, the legislation seeks to mitigate risks and ensure the integrity of US port operations.

OSRA 2.0 establishes committees to advise regulatory bodies on industry practices, in addition to the existing National Shipper Advisory Committee (NSAC). This collaborative approach fosters dialogue between stakeholders and regulatory authorities, facilitating informed decision-making and promoting industry best practices.

The bill’s emphasis on establishing data standards for maritime freight logistics is also noteworthy, signaling a commitment to enhancing transparency and efficiency within the supply chain. By standardizing data protocols, OSRA 2.0 aims to streamline operations, reduce inefficiencies, and improve overall industry performance.

OSRA 2.0 has garnered widespread support from shipper groups and industry associations. The Retail Leaders Industry Association (RILA), among others, has hailed the legislation for its potential to protect US shippers, increase transparency, and strengthen regulatory oversight. This endorsement underscores the significance of OSRA 2.0 in addressing long-standing challenges within the ocean shipping industry and fostering a more resilient and competitive maritime ecosystem.

By fortifying regulatory oversight, enhancing transparency, and safeguarding against external influences, the legislation aims to promote fairness, integrity, and competitiveness in the shipping industry. 

Interested in learning more? Reach out to your Future Forwarding representative today. 

Next Day Shipping Excellence: A Game-Changer for Packages Up to 150 lbs

In the realm of domestic shipping, especially for packages weighing between 50 to 150 lbs, the urgency often demands immediate action. Our service stands out as a beacon of reliability, cost-effectiveness, and unparalleled convenience.

 

Timing is everything. When it comes to getting your packages from Point A to Point B swiftly and efficiently, every hour counts. That’s where our Next Day Shipping service steps in, ready to revolutionize the way you move your goods without breaking the bank.

 

One of the key advantages of our Next Day Shipping service is the significant cost savings it offers compared to traditional overnight providers. With savings ranging from 20 to 30 percent, it’s a game-changer for businesses looking to optimize their logistics expenditure without compromising on quality.

 

But it’s not just about the cost. Flexibility is crucial in today’s dynamic business environment. That’s why we offer extended pick-up times, allowing you to schedule later pickups and still ensure your shipment catches its flight out. 

 

What sets us apart is our commitment to personalized service. From the moment you entrust us with your package, our dedicated team takes singular responsibility for its safe and timely delivery. Whether it’s a crucial component for your manufacturing line or a vital medical device, we understand the importance of minimizing downtime. That’s why your engineers and installers can even pick up your shipment directly from the airport and deliver it straight to your site, reducing waiting times and maximizing productivity.

 

In an industry prone to disruptions, we’ve got you covered. With the ability to reroute shipments through various hubs and offer non-stop service to major destinations, we ensure that your package reaches its destination without delays or complications.

 

But perhaps the most compelling aspect of our Next Day Shipping service is its tailor-made approach. We understand that every business is unique, which is why we offer customizable solutions to suit your specific needs. Whether you need to pick up multiple shipments at once or distribute them across the country, we’ve got the flexibility and expertise to make it happen seamlessly.

 

Our Next Day Shipping service isn’t just about getting your packages from Point A to Point B—it’s about unlocking a world of possibilities for your business. With cost savings, flexibility, and personalized service at its core, it’s time to elevate your shipping experience and leave the competition behind. Experience the difference today.

Connect with Jim Wappler at jimwappler@usffcl.com to find out more. 

Secretary Mayorkas’ Strategy to Protect American Textile Industry from Illicit Trade Practices

The Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas met virtually with members of the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO), comprising both large and small companies pivotal in providing employment opportunities for thousands of American workers. The discussion centered on addressing the significant challenges faced by the textile industry due to illicit practices undermining fair trade agreements and exploiting labor laws.

NCTO representatives highlighted the detrimental impact of unscrupulous actors circumventing free trade agreements, violating the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), and exploiting legal loopholes such as the de minimis shipment exception. In response, Secretary Mayorkas reaffirmed the Department of Homeland Security’s commitment to combating customs violations and protecting American industries.

To address these concerns, Secretary Mayorkas announced the mobilization of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and other DHS agencies to intensify efforts in prosecuting illegal customs practices harming the American textile sector. CBP has already initiated enhanced enforcement measures, employing techniques like physical inspections, laboratory testing, production verification visits, and audits. Moreover, CBP is bolstering its capabilities for isotopic testing to identify goods potentially linked to forced labor violations.

HSI’s focus on labor exploitation investigations aims to curb criminal activities and protect lawful employment opportunities for American workers. Additionally, as the chair of the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force, DHS collaborates with various stakeholders to expand the UFLPA Entity List, publicly identifying and holding accountable entities engaged in or facilitating forced labor.

Secretary Mayorkas mandated the agencies to deliver a comprehensive enforcement action plan within 30 days, evaluating the sufficiency of current trade laws in addressing core issues.

In his statement, Secretary Mayorkas underscored DHS’s commitment to utilizing all available tools, including detecting suspicious transshipment practices, publicizing bad actors, isotopic testing, random parcel inspections, and other law enforcement endeavors, to safeguard the integrity of markets and uphold the American textile industry.

As Secretary Mayorkas reinforces the importance of protecting American industries, including the textile sector, against illicit practices, it’s crucial to partner with a freight forwarder who understands the nuances of compliance and regulation. Future Forwarding not only prioritizes adherence to laws and regulations but is dedicated to your success. Reach out to us today.

Container Hub Ports in North Europe Navigate Challenges Amidst Shipping Delays

The smooth flow of goods relies heavily on efficient port operations. Recent events, such as the rerouting of ships around the African coast due to the Red Sea crisis, have put container hub ports in North Europe to the test. However, amidst concerns of potential congestion, these ports seem to be managing the influx of delayed vessels relatively well.

 

According to the latest updates from Hapag-Lloyd, major hub ports like Rotterdam, Hamburg, and Southampton in North Europe experienced a surge in yard utilization levels last week, reaching between 85% and 90%. This spike, from a previous average of 55%, was attributed to the arrival of delayed vessels rerouted from their original paths. Despite challenges posed by adverse weather conditions in the North Sea and disruptions in landside operations due to trucking issues near Benelux ports and Hamburg, the ports have been able to maintain operations.

 

One significant observation is the relatively healthy status of empty-container stacks at these hubs, with utilization levels currently ranging from 60% to 65%. This suggests that carriers have effectively managed to evacuate a substantial number of containers for return to Asia, mitigating the risk of equipment shortages for export bookings.

 

Looking ahead, Hapag-Lloyd anticipates a trend towards reducing yard utilization levels to more manageable figures of 65% to 70%, as the surge in exports before the Lunar New Year subsides. This forecast instills confidence in the resilience and adaptability of North European hub ports despite facing multiple challenges simultaneously.

 

Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, North American container ports are also navigating their own set of challenges. Reports from Hapag-Lloyd indicate some congestion at US East and Gulf coast ports due to schedule disruptions caused by diversions from both the Panama and Suez canals. In New York, berthing wait times vary across terminals, with longer waits at certain facilities compared to others. Similarly, at Norfolk and Savannah ports, berthing waits for larger vessels are not uncommon, although average gate turn times and dwell times remain within reasonable limits.

 

On the US West Coast, import throughput is on the rise, attributed partly to the Red Sea crisis and Panama Canal restrictions, but also fueled by strong consumer demand. The Port of Los Angeles, one of the busiest in the region, is experiencing a significant increase in import throughput compared to the previous year. Despite the surge in activity, the port has managed to maintain efficient operations, with no berth waiting times reported and vessels spending an average of four days alongside for discharge and load operations.

 

While challenges persist in global shipping, the performance of container hub ports in North Europe and North America exemplifies resilience and adaptability in the face of adversity. Effective management strategies and proactive measures have enabled these ports to navigate through disruptions and maintain essential trade flows, underscoring their crucial role in facilitating international commerce. As the global supply chain continues to evolve, the ability of ports to efficiently handle unforeseen challenges will remain vital for sustaining economic growth and stability.

 

The ability to navigate challenges and ensure the smooth flow of cargo is paramount. At Future Forwarding, we understand the complexities of international logistics and are committed to providing exceptional service to our clients. With an expert team of professionals dedicated to optimizing operations, we ensure that cargo reaches its destination efficiently and reliably. As container hub ports in North Europe and North America demonstrate resilience amidst adversity, we stand ready to support businesses in overcoming logistical hurdles and seizing opportunities for growth. With Future Forwarding, you can trust that your cargo is in capable hands, driving your business forward into the future of global trade. Reach out today to find out more.

A Sweet Turnaround: US-India Perishables Trade Blooms After Tariff Resolution

In the wake of evolving geopolitical dynamics, India and the US have found common ground to foster their perishables trade, particularly in the realm of fresh fruits. A pivotal moment in this trajectory occurred when both nations mutually agreed to eliminate retaliatory tariffs that had served as a significant impediment to trade. 

Recent data from US trade sources reveals a remarkable surge in US apple shipments to India since September, totaling approximately 765,000 40 lb cartons. This stark contrast from the mere 9,000 reported shipments between September and December 2022 underscores the positive impact of tariff removal on trade volumes.

The removal of the import duty has not only facilitated increased quantities but also diversified the market with a range of apple varieties. Jim Bair, President and CEO of the US Apple Association, expressed optimism, stating, “We are seeing success in regaining our number-two market.” The success is not limited to lower-cost varieties but extends to higher-value produce like Fuji, Gala, Granny Smith, and others.

Mumbai-based fresh fruit importer, IG International, echoed this positive sentiment, emphasizing the significant surge in US apple movement due to the 20% reduction in import duty. Tarun Arora, Director of IG International, highlighted the enduring popularity of US apples among Indian consumers.

While the hi-tech-enabled temperature-controlled cargo solutions have enabled efficient transportation over the approximately 9,000 nautical mile journey, concerns loom large in the face of longer transits and escalating freight rates associated with the Red Sea crisis. 

Despite these challenges, India has found an avenue for exports, with pomegranates being shipped to the US following the removal of restrictions. The opening of additional irradiation facilities to meet quality check criteria has been a significant factor contributing to the growth of India’s perishables trade.

While positive signs abound, the shipping crisis in and around the Red Sea route poses a potential threat to the aspirations of Indian exporters. As they navigate these challenges, leveraging efficient freight forwarding services becomes crucial for seamless and cost-effective trade operations.

Looking for a strategic logistics partner? Contact Future Forwarding today to explore comprehensive freight forwarding solutions.

For a call back get in touch:

Contact Us

Ⓒ Future Forwarding 2025. All rights reserved.
Terms of use | Privacy policy | Sitemap | Web Design by Cocoonfx